Kriish Tyagi vs Clement Lemire Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 08:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Tyagi vs C. Lemire

IND
0
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Tyagi 0 - 1 Lemire
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kriish Tyagi winning 0 and Clement Lemire winning 2. The last match between Clement Lemire and Kriish Tyagi was at the M15 Orlando, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Clement Lemire getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tyagi | 0 |
| Lemire | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Orlando(11-05-25)
K. Tyagi vs C. Lemire H2H Profile
K. Tyagi vs C. Lemire Match Preview:
- In recent months, Kriish Tyagi has performed better on their second serve, winning 48.65% of points compared to Clement Lemire's 43.00%. Could this give Tyagi an advantage during the match? The answer could very well be yes.
- Regarding return games, Clement Lemire has a slight edge on opponents' second serve returns, winning 49.64%, while Kriish Tyagi has managed 45.42%.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Tyagi dominates with 31.58% over Lemire’s 26.11%, which might be crucial in competitive rallies.
- Under pressure, both players exhibit similar resilience, with Tyagi saving 50.79% of breakpoints compared to Lemire's 50.40%. Which player performs better in crucial moments? It may ultimately depend on the matchday conditions.
- Looking at performance over the last year, Tyagi has won 60.87% of their matches, slightly trailing Lemire's 66.67%. Will this better win record favor Lemire?
- Tyagi consistently performs best on hard courts with a 58% win rate. Conversely, Lemire shows a preference for clay courts, also winning 58%.
- Both competitors have most of their success at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments level. Lemire, however, boasts a higher win percentage at 66.67% compared to Tyagi's 63.64%.
- When considering opponent quality, Lemire faces higher-ranked opponents (average rank of 141.67) than Tyagi (364.78). Does this exposure to tougher competition give Lemire an edge?
- In matches going to a deciding set, Tyagi has emerged victorious 75% of the time, but Lemire remains unbeaten, with a 100% success rate. In such scenarios, will Lemire's perfect record give them confidence?
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
As the players prepare to face off, each brings differing strengths to the match. While Kriish Tyagi proves strong on the second serve and leads in first serve returns, Clement Lemire excels in returning second serves and has maintained a higher percentage of wins over the past year.
Although both players have similar levels of pressure resilience, Lemire’s experience against tougher opponents may offer an additional edge. Furthermore, Lemire’s perfect record in deciding sets could be a confidence booster if the match becomes competitive.
Considering these factors, Clement Lemire appears slightly favored to win the upcoming match, thanks to their consistent performance against challenging opponents and remarkable poise in decisive moments.
Kriish Tyagi vs Clement Lemire Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Tyagi vs C. Lemire H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:40:5 | Average Match Time | 1:40:5 |
| 63% (36/57) | 1st Serve % | 85% (51/60) |
| 53% (19/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (35/51) |
| 43% (9/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 14% (1/7) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (4/11) |
| 33% (20/60) | Return Points Win % | 51% (29/57) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Tyagi Recent Matches Played
C. Lemire Recent Matches Played

K. Tyagi vs C. Lemire Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.00% (14/11) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.72% (15/14) |
| 51.72% (30/28) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.00% (33/33) |
| 48.66% (272/287) | Games Win/Loss | 51.05% (317/304) |
| 58.33% (14/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.09% (13/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 66 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 34 | Total Double Faults | 54 |
| 1:34:11 | Average Match Time | 1:14:13 |
| 370.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 184.17 |
| 61% (954/1572) | 1st Serve % | 59% (768/1296) |
| 62% (594/954) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (468/768) |
| 52% (322/618) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (249/528) |
| 42% (57/135) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (80/169) |
| 39% (606/1563) | Return Points Win % | 45% (631/1404) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.87% (14/9) | Futures W/L | 51.72% (15/14) |
| 56% (14/25) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (15/29) |
| 80% (8/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 75% (6/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 91% (11/10) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (15/13) |
| 9% (11/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (15/2) |
| 29% (14/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (14/2) |